Abstracting and Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing

Journal of Philology and Codicology Cathexis Studies (JPCCS) is committed to improving the visibility, discoverability, accessibility, and scholarly impact of its published articles through reputable indexing, abstracting, metadata, and discovery services.

JPCCS follows the principle that an indexing or abstracting service should be listed as a current index only after the journal's inclusion has been officially confirmed.

Current Indexing and Registration

Only databases and services in which JPCCS is officially indexed, registered, harvested, or discoverable should be listed in this section.

Suggested format:

Indexed / Registered / Discoverable in:

  • [Verified Service 1]
  • [Verified Service 2]
  • [Verified Service 3]

Planned or Under Evaluation

The journal may separately state databases for which an application is planned or currently under evaluation.

Suggested wording:

Planned Applications / Under Evaluation:

  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • SINTA / ARJUNA
  • Scopus
  • other relevant national and international databases

However, an application or planned submission must not be presented as successful indexing.

Indexing Transparency

JPCCS does not claim inclusion in:

  • Scopus;
  • Web of Science;
  • DOAJ;
  • SINTA;
  • or other selective indexing databases

unless formal acceptance has been received from the relevant organization.

The journal does not use indexing logos in a manner that could mislead authors or readers regarding its current indexing status.

Metadata and Discoverability

JPCCS seeks to maintain accurate and interoperable metadata to support indexing and discovery.

Published articles should include, where available:

  • DOI;
  • title;
  • abstract;
  • author names;
  • institutional affiliations;
  • ORCID IDs;
  • keywords;
  • references;
  • publication dates;
  • copyright information;
  • Creative Commons license information.

Journal Commitment

JPCCS is committed to progressively improving:

  • publication quality;
  • metadata accuracy;
  • DOI registration;
  • publishing regularity;
  • editorial quality;
  • international visibility;
  • author diversity;
  • reviewer diversity;
  • citation impact; and
  • compliance with recognized scholarly publishing standards.