CULTURAL PRACTICE AND KNOWLEDGE INFRASTRUCTURE FROM THE PERIPHERY:A CASE STUDY OF THE ACEH DOCUMENTARY FORUM

Authors

  • Jamaluddin Phonna Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65427/puscen.v2i2.27

Keywords:

Aceh Documentary Forum, Documentary Film, Knowledge Infrastructure, Cultural Practice, Knowledge Production

Abstract

Community documentary forums are often examined as alternative exhibition spaces or venues for public dialogue, while less attention has been paid to the cultural practices through which they sustain locally grounded knowledge. This article examines how the Aceh Documentary Forum (ADF) organizes curation, screening, discussion, documentation, and programmer regeneration as an interconnected cultural process. Using a qualitative case-study design, the research draws on participant observation of ADF activities in Aceh, in-depth interviews with purposively selected organizers, programmers, filmmakers, speakers, and participants, program documentation, and relevant scholarly literature. The data were analysed thematically through data reduction, theme grouping, and interpretation, with source and technique triangulation used to strengthen credibility. The analysis identifies three interrelated findings. First, curation converts local social concerns into a public cultural agenda. Second, documentary films function as shared interpretive objects through which participants relate audiovisual representations to memory and lived experience. Third, documentation, archiving, recurring discussion, and knowledge transfer among programmers extend the forum beyond a single event. The study argues that ADF does not constitute a complete knowledge infrastructure by itself; rather, its recurring cultural practices gradually infrastructuralize local knowledge. This case contributes to cultural studies by linking documentary exhibition, cultural publics, community memory, and peripheral knowledge production.

 

Forum film dokumenter berbasis komunitas umumnya dikaji sebagai ruang eksibisi alternatif atau arena dialog publik, sedangkan praktik budaya yang membuatnya mampu memelihara pengetahuan berbasis pengalaman lokal masih kurang diperhatikan. Artikel ini menganalisis bagaimana Aceh Documentary Forum (ADF) mengorganisasi kurasi, pemutaran, diskusi, dokumentasi, dan regenerasi programmer sebagai satu proses budaya yang saling terhubung. Dengan desain studi kasus kualitatif, penelitian menggunakan observasi partisipatif terhadap penyelenggaraan ADF di Aceh, wawancara mendalam dengan penyelenggara, programmer, pembuat film, narasumber, dan peserta yang dipilih secara purposif, dokumentasi program, serta studi kepustakaan. Data dianalisis secara tematik melalui reduksi data, pengelompokan tema, dan interpretasi, serta diperkuat dengan triangulasi sumber dan teknik. Analisis menghasilkan tiga temuan yang saling berkaitan. Pertama, kurasi mengubah keresahan sosial lokal menjadi agenda budaya publik. Kedua, film dokumenter berfungsi sebagai objek interpretasi bersama yang menghubungkan representasi audiovisual dengan memori dan pengalaman hidup peserta. Ketiga, dokumentasi, pengarsipan, diskusi berulang, dan transfer pengetahuan antargenerasi programmer memperpanjang kehidupan forum melampaui satu kegiatan. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa ADF bukan infrastruktur pengetahuan yang telah selesai, melainkan praktik budayanya secara bertahap menginfrastrukturkan pengetahuan lokal. Studi ini menghubungkan eksibisi dokumenter, publik budaya, memori komunitas, dan produksi pengetahuan dari periferi.

 

غالبًا ما تُدرس منتديات الأفلام الوثائقية المجتمعية بوصفها فضاءات عرض بديلة أو ساحات للحوار العام، بينما لا تحظى الممارسات الثقافية التي تمكّنها من حفظ المعرفة المستندة إلى الخبرة المحلية بالاهتمام الكافي. تحلل هذه الدراسة كيفية تنظيم منتدى آتشيه للأفلام الوثائقية لعمليات الاختيار البرامجي والعرض والنقاش والتوثيق وتجديد المبرمجين بوصفها عملية ثقافية مترابطة. اعتمد البحث دراسة حالة نوعية، واستند إلى الملاحظة بالمشاركة في أنشطة المنتدى في آتشيه، وإلى مقابلات معمقة مع منظمين ومبرمجين وصناع أفلام ومتحدثين ومشاركين اختيروا قصديًا، إضافة إلى وثائق البرامج والدراسات ذات الصلة. وحُللت البيانات موضوعيًا من خلال اختزال البيانات وتجميع الموضوعات وتفسيرها، مع استخدام تثليث المصادر والتقنيات لتعزيز مصداقية النتائج. وأظهر التحليل ثلاث نتائج مترابطة: تحوّل عملية الاختيار القضايا الاجتماعية المحلية إلى أجندة ثقافية عامة؛ ويعمل الفيلم الوثائقي موضوعًا مشتركًا للتأويل يربط التمثيل السمعي البصري بالذاكرة والخبرة المعيشة؛ كما يمدد التوثيق والأرشفة وتكرار النقاش ونقل المعرفة بين المبرمجين أثر المنتدى إلى ما بعد الحدث الواحد. وتخلص الدراسة إلى أن المنتدى ليس بنية معرفية مكتملة، بل إن ممارساته الثقافية المتكررة تسهم تدريجيًا في بناء بنية تحتية للمعرفة المحلية.

References

Achmad, Z. (2023). Formasi dan negosiasi ideologi dalam naskah Hikayat Prang Gompeni: Analisis hegemoni Gramsci. An-Nahdah Al-’Arabiyah, 3(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.22373/nahdah.v3i1.2405

Azhari. (2026). Visual da’wah in the documentary film Senja Geunaseh Sayang: A rhetorical analysis of Islamic messages in the digital era. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Pusaka Cendekia, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.65427/puscen.v2i1.20

Barkin, G. (2006). Cultures of alternative film exhibition: The case of Indonesia. Film History, 18(2), 144–156.

Carey, J. W. (2009). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society (Rev. ed.). Routledge.

Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Polity.

de Valck, M. (2007). Film festivals: From European geopolitics to global cinephilia. Amsterdam University Press.

Edwards, P. N. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. MIT Press.

Fajri, A. (2025). Rhetorical study of ideological representation in public discourse: A critical analysis of socio-cultural discourse. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Pusaka Cendekia, 1(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.65427/puscen.v1i1.6

Fajri, A., & Zulhelmi, A. (2023). Positives and negatives of globalization in the Arabic language. An-Nahdah Al-’Arabiyah, 3(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.22373/nahdah.v3i2.2361

Fenlon, K., Grimmer, J., Reza, A., & Wagner, T. (2025). The Oyster Model: Understanding community roles in sustaining digital cultural knowledge infrastructures. Archival Science, 25, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z

Fenlon, K., Reza, A., Grimmer, J., & Wagner, T. (2023). Mutual sustainability among communities and their knowledge infrastructures. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.775

Getz, D. (2010). The nature and scope of festival studies. International Journal of Event Management Research, 5(1), 1–47.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)

Hanan, D. (2021). Moments in Indonesian film history: Film and popular culture in a developing society 1950–2020. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72613-3

Heeren, K. van. (2012). Contemporary Indonesian film: Spirits of reform and ghosts from the past. KITLV Press.

Jones, M., & Taylor, R. (2024). Beyond access: (Re)designing archival guides for changing landscapes. Archival Science, 24, 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-024-09441-1

Lee, J. A., Alper, B. F., & Emswiler, A. (2023). Origin stories and the shaping of the community-based archives. Archival Science, 23(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-023-09413-x

Mulyadi, M. I., Shaliha, C. A. A., Jafar, A., Azhari, & Fajri, A. (2025). How Arabic media construct armed conflict: A corpus-driven concordance analysis. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Pusaka Cendekia, 1(3), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.65427/puscen.v1i3.15

Nichols, B. (2017). Introduction to documentary (3rd ed.). Indiana University Press.

Olibet, Y. (2024). “Make it look a little like a festival”: Film exhibition and festival organizing at Films Femmes Méditerranée during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068241280525

Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2022). Infrastructuring digital humanities: On relational infrastructure and global reconfiguration of the field. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(2), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab086

Póvoa, D. (2023). ‘The festival is ours’: Power dynamics of community participation in the Alter do Chão Film Festival. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231154288

Punzalan, R. L., & Marsh, D. E. (2022). Reciprocity: Building a discourse in archives. The American Archivist, 85(1), 30–59. https://doi.org/10.17723/2327-9702-85.1.30

Rayburn, A. J., Punzalan, R. L., & Thomer, A. K. (2024). Persisting through friction: Growing a community-driven knowledge infrastructure. Archival Science, 24(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-023-09427-5

Thorpe, K. (2024). Returning love to Ancestors captured in the archives: Indigenous wellbeing, sovereignty and archival sovereignty. Archival Science, 24, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-024-09440-2

Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49

Warner, M. (2005). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Published

2026-08-22

Issue

Section

Articles